Friday, December 30, 2016

The Word Was God: The Quest for the Answer

            In Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, an alien race designs a supercomputer named Deep Thought to answer the greatest question of all—the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. After Deep Thought forces the alien race to wait for millions of years while he considers the question, he finally reveals that he has an answer in this exchange:

"Good Morning," said Deep Thought at last.
"Er..good morning, O Deep Thought," said Loonquawl nervously, "do you have...er, that is..."
"An Answer for you?" interrupted Deep Thought majestically. "Yes, I have....Though I don't think," added Deep Thought. "that you're going to like it."
"Doesn't matter!" said Phouchg. "We must know it! Now!"
"Now?" inquired Deep Thought.
"Yes! Now..."
"All right," said the computer, and settled into silence again. The two men fidgeted. The tension was unbearable.
"You're really not going to like it," observed Deep Thought.
"Tell us!"
"All right," said Deep Thought. "The Answer to the Great Question..."
"Yes..!"
"Of Life, the Universe and Everything..." said Deep Thought.
"Yes...!"
"Is..." said Deep Thought, and paused.
"Yes...!"
"Is..."
"Yes...!!!...?"
"Forty-two," said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm.

            The simple nihilism of Adams’ vision is clear to see. The answer to the single Question which plagues humanity is nonsensical. There is no meaning to be found anywhere, least of all in the great question of the universe’s existence.

            And yet, although I might disagree with Adams’ final conclusion, I find a good amount of wisdom in his simplification of the question which his characters ask. His alien heroes do not seek a myriad of answers to a multitude of questions. Instead, they distill every question which could possibly be asked into one single question—the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. Not only do they express all questions as one, but they seem to expect a single answer as well—a short, clear nugget of truth which will contain an explanation for every problem which might ever arise.

            This expectation of one single answer, if not the answer which Adams presents, is entirely rational to me. In fact, I have been living with this expectation for all my life.

            I hesitate to describe this feeling for fear of abject failure. I have attempted only once to put this sensibility into words, and upon that occasion I was unsuccessful. Here I will try again.

            All my life, I have held a spiritual conviction that all of the world, every question, every occurrence, can be judged and considered based on one single value. You have undoubtedly heard the often reiterated phrase, spoken in reply to some simplistic distillment, that “the real world is more complicated than that.” I have always felt the opposite—that the real world is far less complicated than that.

This strange conviction comes in the form of an odd thought in the back of my mind which, like a drop of water, slips away when I attempt to grasp hold of it. It arises every time I face a complex question, an unanswered problem, and whispers that there is one shapeless mystery which provides the key to every question I have ever asked, or ever could ask.

            I know that you will ask what the nature of this single answer is. This question is impossible to answer. I do not know. I can say only that it is not a word contained in any human language. And in case you have never experienced the odd certainty of this value which answers all earthly questions, I’ll attempt to describe it for you.

            It is something like the feeling you get when you listen to your favorite song, and there is that one particular moment where the music soars and your heart lifts and for just one moment, you are no longer on earth, because you have experienced something wordless that expressed the inexpressible.

            It is something like a single match lit in the darkness, illuminating everything before it, showing what the shadows really were all along.

            It is something like the satisfying feeling once you have finished a masterfully written novel, and you close the book knowing that you have been in the hands of a great author, and that the characters have developed and grown and found their endings precisely as he wanted them to.

            It is something like the power of an immense hurricane—more powerful than anything you have ever known or experienced, and stronger than you could have dreamed.

            It is the magic behind the words “Let there be light” that propelled our universe into existence.

            It is the wordless wonder in music that finds a direct pathway to our souls.

            It is the answer, not just to one question, but to every question—the final solution, the single word that stills the waves and calms the sea.

            This nameless value, this unknown answer, is the hope of the man who has nothing left in the world, but who still clings to the belief that his life is worth more than his circumstances, and there are angels beyond his vision.

            It is the source of the courage of a soldier who dies for his comrades, who even dies for strangers he will never meet.

            It is the reason for the simple faith of a child who trusts that everything will be okay, although he does not understand how.

            Like the sun, we cannot look at it directly. It is so great, so glorious, that we can only see it out of the corner of our eyes, reflected in the best and brightest of the world around us. And like the sun, I believe that this strange answer will come in the form of something we have always known—but we will see it for the first time for what it really is.

            The quest to find this mysterious value is not easy, and it cannot be completed on earth. But we may find a clue in John 1:1, which says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

            Perhaps when I experience the wordless conviction that there is an answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything, I am experiencing the longing of the Israelites who were promised an answer to their failings thousands of years ago. God’s people were promised an answer:

“The people walking in darkness
    have seen a great light;
on those living in the land of deep darkness
    a light has dawned.” (Isaiah 9:2)

The light illuminates the darkness and reveals every hidden mystery, answers every question. It is the single answer to the inarticulate question of the universe.

The Word is the Answer that has existed from the beginning of time, the light which was hidden away for so long. The Word was with God, and the Word was God. And in answer to the desperation of His people, the Word came here and walked among us. That is the mystery of the incarnation—not merely the fact that our Creator became one of the beings He created, but that we stared into the face of the Answer.

But we humans, with our small brains, are incapable of understanding the Answer. All that we know is that He was here—and that He was the face of Love, the personification of Glory, the vision of everything that we may know in part but not in whole.

This is our longing and our hope—that we have seen the Answer, but cannot know it. We see the light of the sun, but we must not stare directly at it. We have been told the name of our salvation, but we may not know its mind.

When I read the book Till We Have Faces by C.S. Lewis, I was astounded by the final passage, for it seemed to put into words the solution to my inarticulate conviction. The novel depicts the rage-filled writings of Orual, a woman who seeks to lay out her grievances before the gods. She wishes to describe her sufferings to the immortals, and then at the end demand an answer for all the pain she has known. But when she finally is given the chance she has always wanted, when she stands in the courtroom of the gods and presents her case, she discovers that she has already been answered—not with words, but with the incomprehensible presence of the divine.

I wrote earlier that I feared my incompetence in the task of expressing in human language the strange feeling that always arose in my soul when I faced a difficult problem. Perhaps I have failed to describe it even now, and if so, I apologize. But even so, I leave you with the words of C.S. Lewis, who described the conclusion to my conviction more perfectly than I could ever dream of doing.

“I ended my first book with the words 'no answer.' I know now, Lord, why you utter no answer. You are yourself the answer. Before your face questions die away. What other answer would suffice?"

Monday, December 19, 2016

Joy to the World: In Defense of Santa Claus

Let’s face it—Santa Claus has a bit of a bad reputation. It seems impossible to turn around these days without facing yet another snippy article accusing parents of destroying their children’s deepest convictions by telling them the awful lie that Santa Claus is real.

“How dare you ruin the logical development of your child’s brain?” these articles demand of us in righteous fury. “How dare you insinuate that something is real which does not physically exist? How could you tear apart the rational functions of the human mind, since obviously the human mind is the only thing that matters?”

Perhaps it is too much to expect Christian bloggers at least to refrain from this nonsense—but recently I came across an article written by John Piper discussing how Christians should make their Christmas celebrations Jesus-centric, and explaining how that effort requires sacrificing Santa Claus on the altar of reality.

Piper says:

“My question is this: How could we possibly even think of giving our children a bowl of bland, sugarless porridge when they are offered the greatest meal in the world? Why would we give them Santa Claus when they can have the incarnation of the Son of God? It is just mind-boggling to me that any Christian would even contemplate such a trade — that we would divert attention away from the incarnation of the God of the universe into this world to save us and our children. I scarcely have words for it that people would contemplate this. Not only is Santa Claus not true and Jesus is very truth himself, but compared to Jesus, Santa is simply pitiful and our kids should be helped to see this.”

Although Mr. Piper is a wonderful theologian and a wise man, he is wrong on this count. Very wrong. I have come to defend Santa Claus against the likes of Mr. Piper and other Christians who hold him in contempt.

Firstly, we must dispense with the silly notion that Santa Claus is not real. This idea comes along with modern insistence that all our truth also be fact. We have lost the ability to divorce reality from fact, and we suffer greatly for it.

J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis had much this same argument—over myth and fact—during Lewis’s long road to faith. According to J.R.R. Tolkien: A Biography, they had this exchange:

But, said Lewis, myths are lies, even though lies breathed through silver.
No, said Tolkien, they are not. …Just as speech is invention about objects and ideas, so myth is invention about truth.
We have come from God (continued Tolkien), and inevitably the myths woven by us, though they contain error, will also reflect a splintered fragment of the true light, the eternal truth that is with God. Indeed only by myth-making, only by becoming a ‘sub-creator’ and inventing stories, can Man aspire to the state of perfection that he knew before the Fall. Our myths may be misguided, but they steer however shakily towards the true harbour, while materialistic ‘progress’ leads only to a yawning abyss and the Iron Crown of the power of evil.
You mean, asked Lewis, that the story of Christ is simply a true myth, a myth that works on us in the same way as the others, but a myth that really happened? In that case, he said, I begin to understand.

A myth is not a lie. Repeat that until it is deeply seared into your soul. A myth is not a lie. A myth is an embodiment of truth, told in a way that speaks to the human soul. The myth of Santa Claus speaks truth to a child’s soul in a deeper sense than mere lectures ever could. Santa Claus is real, whether or not he physically exists.

Mr. Piper continues his objections to Santa Claus with this assertion:

“Santa Claus offers only earthly things, nothing lasting, nothing eternal. Jesus offers eternal joy with the world thrown in. Yeah, the fire engine is thrown in.”

With all due respect, Mr. Piper, this is silly. Not the part about Jesus offering eternal joy with the world thrown in—that is absolutely true. But it is silly to presume that giving a little child a plastic fire engine on Christmas morning is in no way eternal.

Every Christmas, we sing the song Joy to the World, and somehow we expect children to understand what that means. We tell them that Jesus is the joy in the world, and that He offers them a joy that lasts forever. But that little fire engine wrapped in bright paper gives the word joy a meaning. How is the child expected to understand a concept so great, so marvelous, that adults have difficulty putting it into words? The gifts of Santa Claus fill a child’s heart with a wonder and magic far beyond anything we could ever instill using mere lectures.

It is not enough to tell a child that Jesus loves him and offers him joy. The child will feel that love, feel that joy, through the passing material things he receives on Christmas morning.

Mr. Piper also claims that Santa Claus “offers his ephemeral goodies only on the condition of good works.” Once again, this is rather nonsensical. Have you ever seen a child receive coal in his stocking on Christmas morning? Of course not. But the condition must exist, all the same.

Santa Claus teaches children, in the simplest terms possible, what the Law is. Johnny learns that he must be a nice little boy, and be good and kind and obey his parents, if he is going to receive a reward. And isn’t that the embodiment of the Old Testament? Deuteronomy 5:33 says, “You shall walk in all the way which the LORD your God has commanded you, that you may live and that it may be well with you, and that you may prolong your days in the land which you will possess.”

The Law comes with a promise. Santa’s list comes with its own promise, but a promise which makes sense to children—do good, and you will receive good. Do evil, and you will receive coal. Every child understands this condition the moment he hears it. This seems to be only fair, only just. The Law is written upon his heart, and he feels that he is capable of fulfilling it. Every year he tries.

But on Christmas morning, every child knows that he has not fulfilled the requirement, no matter how hard he has worked. Every child knows that he deserves coal—and yet, every single Christmas, he receives gifts instead. He is given what he does not deserve. And that wonder—the wonder of grace—is powerful to the heart of a child.

The story of Santa Claus speaks mercy into the lives of children, and it does so using a story full of magic and flying reindeer and busy elves and candy and toys. Santa Claus tells the story of the joy and fun and beauty of Jesus, but he speaks in the language of a little child.

Chances are, if you tell a child the story of Christmas, he will not comprehend it. How can he? How can he yet understand the virgin birth, the miracle of the star, the strange magic of laying a king into a manger? But he can understand the love behind a simple gift. He can understand the miracle of finding presents instead of coal, the strange magic of reindeer who fly instead of run.

Like C.S. Lewis’s great lion Aslan, Santa Claus is simply a childhood name for the joy and hope of Jesus Christ. And like the Pevensies in Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia, children will one day see Santa for what he always was—a shadow of the grace of Jesus.

As Lewis writes:

“It isn't Narnia, you know," sobbed Lucy. "It's you. We shan't meet you there. And how can we live, never meeting you?"
"But you shall meet me, dear one," said Aslan.
"Are—are you there too, Sir?" said Edmund.
"I am," said Aslan. "But there I have another name. You must learn to know me by that name. This was the very reason why you were brought to Narnia, that by knowing me here for a little, you may know me better there.”

Mr. Piper ends his stern rebuke of Santa Claus with these words:

“I cannot see why a parent — if they know and love Jesus, if they have found Jesus to be the greatest treasure in the world — why they would bring Jesus out of the celebration and Santa into the celebration at all. He is just irrelevant. He has nothing to do with it. He is zero.”

But why must there be mutual exclusivity? Why must we give up Santa Claus when we celebrate Jesus? Santa Claus points to Jesus in the truest way possible. Why can we not have both?

Under Mr. Piper’s logic, why not eliminate Christmas movies like Elf, How the Grinch Stole Christmas, and It’s a Wonderful Life from our repertoires? Why not put away our Charles Dickens’ Christmas Carols and our Barbara Robinson’s Best Christmas Pageant Evers? Why not read only the second chapter of the gospel of Luke, all day, every day?

Because we respond to magic. Joy. Wonder. All these things come from the original Christmas story, and they are so powerful that we create beautiful art based on them. The art points back to Christmas, and that is why the art is worthwhile. The celebration of Christmas gives joy a meaning to children in the most profound sense possible—but it renews a sense of wonder in adults too. The magic of Christmas is never wholly lost, no matter how old you become, no matter how apathetic you feel. Santa Claus embodies that magic.


As Charles Dickens says in his immortal work A Christmas Carol, “For it is good to be children sometimes, and never better than at Christmas, when its mighty Founder was a child Himself.